PMID Table Mock-up
Background
It was discussed at the June meeting that the phenotype annotation table on the literature page needs to be reformatted. The user would select whether the phenotype entered was for a taxonomic entity (state phenotype) or a genetic difference (relative). Once this selection has been made, the nature of the table headings would change to reflect this selection. Below are the mock-ups for the different tables. Additional changes are listed.
- add “Relative to” column so people can input the reference (e.g. with respect to WT, single mutant, etc).
- information regarding the species, taxon ID, and "genetic difference" (to replace "gene name") would be displayed in one box instead of multiple boxes across the table
- linking multiple single annotations together for the purpose of capturing more complex single phenotypes. The idea of setting IDs for the individual annotations (rows) and linking them together
Issues to be Discussed
- 1 vs. 2 tables
- How would we parse the "Taxon Information"?
- How would we link rows together to capture complex phenotypes?
- How would we capture the "wild type" or "parent" phenotypes in a paper and will these be marked within the table?
Relative Phenotype Annotations
See Help:AnnotationTable for details on how to edit this table.
| Taxon Information | Relevant Genotype | OMP ID | OMP Term Name | With/From | ECO ID | ECO Term Name | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
OMP:0000001 |
Automatic Fill-in |
This will appear when certain terms are selected |
ECO:0000001 |
Automatic Fill-in |
Table 1 |
|
|
OMP:0000001 |
Automatic Fill-in |
It may not be called "with/from," but you get the idea |
ECO:0000001 |
Automatic Fill-in |
Figure 2 |
|
|
OMP:0000001 |
Automatic Fill-in |
It may not be called "with/from," but you get the idea |
ECO:0000001 |
Automatic Fill-in |
Figure 2 |
| edit table |
