Category:ECO:0000033 ! traceable author statement - Revision history

127.0.0.1: ECO:0000033_!_traceable_author_statement renamed to ECO:0000033_!_author_statement_supported_by_traceable_reference

2018-05-20T07:06:32Z

ECO:0000033_!_traceable_author_statement renamed to ECO:0000033_!_author_statement_supported_by_traceable_reference

127.0.0.1: update ECO:0000033_!_traceable_author_statement page

2016-10-19T20:19:34Z

update ECO:0000033_!_traceable_author_statement page

127.0.0.1: update ECO:0000033_!_traceable_author_statement page

2013-10-19T06:00:07Z

update ECO:0000033_!_traceable_author_statement page

127.0.0.1: update ECO:0000033_!_traceable_author_statement page

2013-03-05T20:51:57Z

update ECO:0000033_!_traceable_author_statement page

127.0.0.1 at 18:25, 21 July 2011

2011-07-21T18:25:17Z

New page

{{Autobox|1='''id''':ECO:0000033 
'''name''':traceable author statement 
'''def''':"An author statement that is based on a cited reference." [ECO:MCC, GO:TAS] 
'''synonym''':"TAS" EXACT [GO:TAS] 
'''is_a''':[[:Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]][[Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]] 
'''comment''':The traceable author statement (TAS) evidence code covers author statements that are attributed to a cited source. Typically this type of information comes from review articles. Material from the introductions and discussion sections of non-review papers may also be suitable if another reference is cited as the source of experimental work or analysis. When annotating with this code the curator should use caution and be aware that authors often cite papers dealing with experiments that were performed in organisms different from the one being discussed in the paper at hand. Thus a problem with the TAS code is that it may turn out from following up the references in the paper that no experiments were performed on the gene in the organism actually being characterized in the primary paper. For this reason we recommend (when time and resources allow) that curators track down the cited paper and annotate directly from the experimental paper using the appropriate experimental evidence code. When this is not possible and it is necessary to annotate from reviews, the TAS code is the appropriate code to use for statements that are associated with a cited reference. Once an annotation has been made to a given term using an experimental evidence code, we recommend removing any annotations made to the same term using the TAS evidence code. 
}}
== Notes ==

==References ==
{{RefHelp}}
<references/>

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 20 May 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~{{Autobox\|1='''id:''' ECO:0000033<br>~~	+	#REDIRECT [[:Category:ECO:0000033_!_author_statement_supported_by_traceable_reference]]
−	~~'''name:''' traceable author statement<br>~~	+	== Usage Notes ==
−	~~'''def:''' "A type of author statement that is based on a cited reference." [ECO:MCC, GO:TAS]<br>~~
−	~~'''is_a:''' [[:Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement\|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]][[Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement\|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]]<br>~~
−	~~'''disjoint_from:'''~~ [[:Category:ECO:~~0000034 ! non-traceable author statement\|ECO:0000034~~ ! ~~non-traceable author statement~~]]~~<br>~~
−	'''comment:''' The traceable author statement (TAS) evidence code covers author statements that are attributed to a cited source. Typically this type of information comes from review articles. Material from the introductions and discussion sections of non-review papers may also be suitable if another reference is cited as the source of experimental work or analysis. When annotating with this code the curator should use caution and be aware that authors often cite papers dealing with experiments that were performed in organisms different from the one being discussed in the paper at hand. Thus a problem with the TAS code is that it may turn out from following up the references in the paper that no experiments were performed on the gene in the organism actually being characterized in the primary paper. For this reason we recommend (when time and resources allow) that curators track down the cited paper and annotate directly from the experimental paper using the appropriate experimental evidence code. When this is not possible and it is necessary to annotate from reviews, the TAS code is the appropriate code to use for statements that are associated with a cited reference. Once an annotation has been made to a given term using an experimental evidence code, we recommend removing any annotations made to the same term using the TAS evidence code.<br>
−	}}
−	== Notes ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Autobox|1='''id:''' ECO:0000033<br>
 '''name:''' traceable author statement<br>
-'''def:''' "An author statement that is based on a cited reference." [ECO:MCC, GO:TAS]<br>
+'''def:''' "A type of author statement that is based on a cited reference." [ECO:MCC, GO:TAS]<br>
 '''is_a:''' [[:Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]][[Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]]<br>
 '''disjoint_from:''' [[:Category:ECO:0000034 ! non-traceable author statement|ECO:0000034 ! non-traceable author statement]]<br>

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 '''def:''' "An author statement that is based on a cited reference." [ECO:MCC, GO:TAS]<br>
 '''is_a:''' [[:Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]][[Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]]<br>
 '''comment:''' The traceable author statement (TAS) evidence code covers author statements that are attributed to a cited source. Typically this type of information comes from review articles. Material from the introductions and discussion sections of non-review papers may also be suitable if another reference is cited as the source of experimental work or analysis. When annotating with this code the curator should use caution and be aware that authors often cite papers dealing with experiments that were performed in organisms different from the one being discussed in the paper at hand. Thus a problem with the TAS code is that it may turn out from following up the references in the paper that no experiments were performed on the gene in the organism actually being characterized in the primary paper. For this reason we recommend (when time and resources allow) that curators track down the cited paper and annotate directly from the experimental paper using the appropriate experimental evidence code. When this is not possible and it is necessary to annotate from reviews, the TAS code is the appropriate code to use for statements that are associated with a cited reference. Once an annotation has been made to a given term using an experimental evidence code, we recommend removing any annotations made to the same term using the TAS evidence code.<br>
 }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Autobox|1='''id''':ECO:0000033<br>
+{{Autobox|1='''id:''' ECO:0000033<br>
-'''name''':traceable author statement<br>
+'''name:''' traceable author statement<br>
-'''def''':"An author statement that is based on a cited reference." [ECO:MCC, GO:TAS]<br>
+'''def:''' "An author statement that is based on a cited reference." [ECO:MCC, GO:TAS]<br>
-'''synonym''':"TAS" EXACT [GO:TAS]<br>
+'''is_a:''' [[:Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]][[Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]]<br>
-'''is_a''':[[:Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]][[Category:ECO:0000204 ! author statement|ECO:0000204 ! author statement]]<br>
+'''comment:''' The traceable author statement (TAS) evidence code covers author statements that are attributed to a cited source. Typically this type of information comes from review articles. Material from the introductions and discussion sections of non-review papers may also be suitable if another reference is cited as the source of experimental work or analysis. When annotating with this code the curator should use caution and be aware that authors often cite papers dealing with experiments that were performed in organisms different from the one being discussed in the paper at hand. Thus a problem with the TAS code is that it may turn out from following up the references in the paper that no experiments were performed on the gene in the organism actually being characterized in the primary paper. For this reason we recommend (when time and resources allow) that curators track down the cited paper and annotate directly from the experimental paper using the appropriate experimental evidence code. When this is not possible and it is necessary to annotate from reviews, the TAS code is the appropriate code to use for statements that are associated with a cited reference. Once an annotation has been made to a given term using an experimental evidence code, we recommend removing any annotations made to the same term using the TAS evidence code.<br>
 }}
 == Notes ==